When someone asks an AI assistant to find a registered dietitian, does it name your practice?

Questions our scan asks about dietitian practices

These are examples of the questions our scan and audit put to AI engines, written with your own service and town. They are not a claim about how patients search.

• "Can you recommend a registered dietitian in Hamilton?"
• "I need a dietitian near Burlington for help with diabetes. Who should I see?"
• "What should I look for when choosing a dietitian in Hamilton, and who would you suggest?"
• "Which clinic in Hamilton offers meal planning for food allergies?"

What we check for dietitian practices

• In the implementation kit: Person markup for the dietitians named on your site, with the doctor title left off a dietitian's name and a note saying why.
• With your practice's details on file (Audit + Advisor and Ongoing Advisor): LocalBusiness markup for your practice in the kit. Save a category such as dietitian, which the kit reads as dietetics.

What the free scan and every paid audit read for any clinic is on our page for clinics. How we measure AI visibility.

Your college's advertising rules, and how we work within them

The College of Dietitians of Ontario's rules for advertising in Ontario, and the law's. Words in quotation marks are the source's own; the rest is our summary. Each links to the page it comes from.

How we work within them: we do not sell leads or lead generation, and our offers are at fixed prices. The kit gives a dietitian practice no request for ratings and no rating markup, and drops the common claim wording it recognises (listed below). With Ongoing Advisor you approve each change before it goes live.

We are not your regulator and this is not legal advice; your college's current standard is the authority.

What the kit does for dietitian practices

• No review request. The College of Dietitians of Ontario's standard says "Dietitians must not solicit clients, former clients or caregivers for testimonials or reviews", and names Google reviews.
• Rewritten titles and descriptions, FAQ markup and service names leave out the common claim wording the kit recognises, such as claims of superiority, titles the college has not authorized, offers of free services, wording that quotes patients or shows their ratings and promises of results. Some of these are the College's rules (linked above); others the kit leaves out as a caution. No word list catches every phrasing, so check the rest of the kit's wording against the College's current standard.
• Your clinic's name, address and phone number as the kit has them, and street addresses written the usual way, are not read as claim wording. When your clinic's name itself includes a word of that kind, the kit keeps it and says so, and when it leaves out a rewritten title or description or a page of its llms.txt draft, it says how many and why.
• Practitioner markup without the doctor title on a practitioner's name, with a note saying why.
• The kit leaves out the offers of free services it can detect, although the standard allows incentives and discounts with "clear and prominent terms and conditions": the kit cannot write those terms for you, so if you run an offer, word it and its terms yourself.
• It adds no photos and does not check yours against the guideline's conditions on before and after pictures.
• Since Standard 5 is met by advertising that "does not include, link to, or solicit reviews", its LocalBusiness markup drops from sameAs any listing we matched whose page shows ratings, your Google listing included, with a note saying why.

Every section of the kit, and when it appears: what is in the implementation kit. To have the fixes made for you: how the advisor works.

Three ways to work with us

Questions from dietitians